gifti toolbox Search Results


ica 2.0d of fmri toolbox  (SourceForge net)
90
SourceForge net ica 2.0d of fmri toolbox
Ica 2.0d Of Fmri Toolbox, supplied by SourceForge net, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ica 2.0d of fmri toolbox/product/SourceForge net
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ica 2.0d of fmri toolbox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gift toolbox  (SourceForge net)
90
SourceForge net gift toolbox
Gift Toolbox, supplied by SourceForge net, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gift toolbox/product/SourceForge net
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gift toolbox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
ica toolbox gift  (InfoMax Inc)
90
InfoMax Inc ica toolbox gift
Ica Toolbox Gift, supplied by InfoMax Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ica toolbox gift/product/InfoMax Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ica toolbox gift - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fmri toolbox  (MathWorks Inc)
96
MathWorks Inc fmri toolbox
Fmri Toolbox, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fmri toolbox/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fmri toolbox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gift v4.0.5.2 toolbox  (SourceForge net)
90
SourceForge net gift v4.0.5.2 toolbox
Gift V4.0.5.2 Toolbox, supplied by SourceForge net, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gift v4.0.5.2 toolbox/product/SourceForge net
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gift v4.0.5.2 toolbox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fmri toolbox gift matlab software  (MathWorks Inc)
96
MathWorks Inc fmri toolbox gift matlab software
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Fmri Toolbox Gift Matlab Software, supplied by MathWorks Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fmri toolbox gift matlab software/product/MathWorks Inc
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fmri toolbox gift matlab software - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gift v3.0b  (SourceForge net)
90
SourceForge net gift v3.0b
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Gift V3.0b, supplied by SourceForge net, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gift v3.0b/product/SourceForge net
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gift v3.0b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
neuromark_fmri_1.0 template  (NeuroMark Genomics Inc)
90
NeuroMark Genomics Inc neuromark_fmri_1.0 template
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Neuromark Fmri 1.0 Template, supplied by NeuroMark Genomics Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/neuromark_fmri_1.0 template/product/NeuroMark Genomics Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
neuromark_fmri_1.0 template - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
fmri toolbox gift version 1.3h  (SourceForge net)
90
SourceForge net fmri toolbox gift version 1.3h
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Fmri Toolbox Gift Version 1.3h, supplied by SourceForge net, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fmri toolbox gift version 1.3h/product/SourceForge net
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fmri toolbox gift version 1.3h - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gift toolbox v3.0b  (SourceForge net)
90
SourceForge net gift toolbox v3.0b
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Gift Toolbox V3.0b, supplied by SourceForge net, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gift toolbox v3.0b/product/SourceForge net
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gift toolbox v3.0b - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
ica toolbox  (SourceForge net)
90
SourceForge net ica toolbox
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Ica Toolbox, supplied by SourceForge net, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/ica toolbox/product/SourceForge net
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
ica toolbox - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier
gift toolbox version 2.0d  (SourceForge net)
90
SourceForge net gift toolbox version 2.0d
FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: <t>BOLD-fMRI</t> scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.
Gift Toolbox Version 2.0d, supplied by SourceForge net, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gift toolbox version 2.0d/product/SourceForge net
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gift toolbox version 2.0d - by Bioz Stars, 2026-05
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: BOLD-fMRI scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.

Journal: Epilepsia open

Article Title: Intrinsic brain network stability during kainic acid-induced epileptogenesis.

doi: 10.1002/epi4.70002

Figure Lengend Snippet: FIGURE 4 (A) The within-network reliability analysis across three experimental trials (Trials 1, 2, and 3: BOLD-fMRI scan at Days 0–1, Days 2–3, and Days 4–5, respectively) was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the sham control group. No significant difference was observed in any sub-networks. (B). The within-network reliability across three trials was assessed by the MN sub-networks in the KA group. A significantly large ICA intensity was observed in Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the PrR, Trial 2 vs. Trial 1 in the DHpL, and Trial 3 vs. Trial 2 in the DHpR. One asterisk (*) identifies adjusted P values lower than 0.1. (C). Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reflects the test–retest reliability in four MN sub-networks in the sham rats and KA rats. It indicated a low-to-excellent reliability in sham, while the average reliability dropped in the KA group.

Article Snippet: 2.3.1 | Identification of main network (MN) using group ICA Group- level BOLD- fMRI data were analyzed using GICA in the Group ICA of FMRI Toolbox (GIFT) Matlab software to identify MNs during brain resting state.29 This involved setting 20 independent components (ICs), conducting a two- step principal component analysis (PCA) reduction, and using the Infomax algorithm with ICASSO for component analysis.30 After ICA decomposition, F I G U R E 1 Research flowchart of our proposed study. nloaded from https://onlinelibrary.w iley.com /doi/10.1002/epi4.70002 by IN A SP - N E PA L , W iley O nline L ibrary on [25/02/2025].

Techniques: Control